Editorial Note: This article first appeared in the magazine The Christian’s Friend and Instructor Volume 24, 1897 Edition. I found this little article to be of such a great help in my present study of the book of Ezekiel I decided to reproduce it here in its entirety for your benefit. While the text below is original, I have added formatting for readability and emphasized portions I found of particular importance. The Christian’s Friend and Instructor is available in Kindle format here and at STEM Publishing here.
Both Ezekiel and John were commanded to eat the book which contained the subjects of their future testimonies; and every servant who seeks the grace of bearing testimony for Christ in this world, whether amongst His people, or before the world, will do well to weigh the significance of that which was enjoined. One difference, however, has to be noted. In Ezekiel’s case we are told that when he ate the book, it was in his mouth as honey for sweetness; and also in John’s, but it is added that as soon as he had eaten, his belly was bitter. This difference probably vanishes when the exact language in connection with Ezekiel is considered. He was told to cause his belly to eat, and to fill his bowels with the roll given to him; but he only lets us know the effects of its taste in his mouth. In the combination of the two cases three things are clearly indicated – eating, digesting, and the effect of digesting.
Eating the Book
By eating, taking the act in its scriptural meaning, we understand that the Word was to be appropriated. These prophets were to make the messages they were commissioned to deliver their own. The Bible – widening the application – is not a book of information to be gleaned, and then to be repeated, but is the voice of God to the soul that reads it, and thus to be heard for oneself before what is heard can be rightly communicated. Thus a well-known servant of the Lord once said that he never read a chapter in the Bible with a view to speaking; and, when he was asked why he read it, he replied that it was for his own profit and edification. In other words, his habit was to eat and to digest the Word before he preached it. We may all learn the lesson, especially when there is such a widespread temptation on every hand to repeat what we have heard before we have appropriated it for ourselves. If, indeed, Ezekiel and John may be taken as examples (and others might be added), we are not qualified to be the living channels of divine truth until we have made it our own.
Digesting the Book
Even eating or appropriating is not sufficient; there is also to be the digesting of what we have appropriated. There cannot be a doubt that in John 6 eating the flesh and drinking the blood of the Son of man include this, because there is manifestly there the assimilation to the death on which we feed. Most of us know from our own experience that the process of digesting the truth we have really received is often a slow operation; and also that the truth is never effective in us, or through us, until it has been digested. There is a great distinction therefore between the two things mentioned in Ezekiel, having the roll in his mouth and enjoying its sweetness, and eating it with his belly, and filling his bowels with it. For the latter we need to be alone in the presence of God, and to learn there that His Word is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. It is then that the mind of God is really communicated; and, inwardly appropriated, it so molds and controls us, that we are morally fashioned according to the revelation made to our souls.
The Effect of Digesting the Book
But in connection with this there will be the effect mentioned in the case of John. That which was sweet in his mouth was bitter in his belly. This should be easily understood by every spiritual believer. The opening out of some new truth to the soul, the perception of its character and beauty, is ever a delightful experience; but when it is accepted in the power of the Spirit it gradually brings death in upon all that we are, and then it becomes “bitter” as it discovers to us the real nature of many things which we had hitherto cherished, and, in separating us from them, produces in us a growing conformity to Christ. If it be true, as every Christian knows it is, that Christ Himself had to pass through death to secure the eternal blessing of His people, it is also true that every one of His own must also go through death in order to enjoy what He has secured. This will be acknowledged by all in regard to the future; but the important point is that it is possible for us to anticipate the joys of heaven now if we are willing to die morally, and to enter upon our true place of association with a risen Christ. This, however, must be a “bitter” experience naturally.
It might seem to some that the words of Jeremiah are in conflict with what has been said. He says, “Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and Thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by Thy name, O Lord God of hosts.” (Jeremiah 15:16.) The context, however, shows that he looks back to the time when, as John, he ate the book and found it as sweet as honey in his mouth; for the supplicating cry which he raises betrays the exceeding bitterness of his soul arising from the effect of the words which at first had filled him with rejoicing. On the one hand, he was surrounded with persecutors, and he had to suffer rebuke for the sake of Him who had commissioned him to speak to His people; and, on the other, he was made to feel that the Lord’s hand was upon him, as he cried, “Why is my pain perpetual, and my wound incurable, which refuseth to be healed? Wilt Thou be altogether unto me as a liar, and as waters that fail?” Here, therefore, as also in the other instances, we find the same unvarying order – eating, digesting, and bitterness; and we may thus conclude that this will ever be the order in every similar case. If so, there are several important lessons to be learned from the examples cited, which we shall do well to consider.
- The first is, that we are never qualified to be witnesses until we have gone through the processes indicated. As it was not enough either for Ezekiel or John to hear, or even to understand the divine message they received, so it must not be sufficient for us to be attracted by the beauty of new teachings, and to find them sweeter than honey to our taste; but we must be content to wait until the truth has worked its way into our innermost being, so that, having thus received the testimony, we are enabled from our own experience to set to our seal that God is true. There are two infallible marks of the witness who has eaten, digested, and found the bitterness of the truth in its self-application. The first is humility. Death works in him, while life flows out through his testimony towards others. (2 Corinthians 4:12.) Self, indeed, is practically set aside, as held under the cross; and “the life of Jesus” has then its free and unimpeded course through the vessel.
- The second is love. In proportion as death (” bitterness”) works in us, the divine nature is in activity; and God is love. Hence the apostle says, after speaking of the gifts which God has set in the assembly, “Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity [love], I am become as a sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.”
The Lip and the Life
But there are lessons for all believers, inasmuch as all are witnesses in their own circles, if not in a public way. Let us then all learn that we cannot study the Bible, or writings upon the Scriptures, or printed ministry, in the way that human subjects are studied. Until what we read or hear is made good in and verified by the soul, we do not really possess it. There are only two channels of testimony – the lip and the life, and the lip should be but the expression of what has first been produced in the life. Thus Paul, after speaking of the gospel which he had preached among the Thessalonians, says: “Ye know what manner of men we were among you for your sake.” This, then, is what we should all desire, intense reality, to be possessed and controlled by the truth we profess to hold, and thus to shun the use of phrases and sentences which we have never eaten, digested, and found true in our souls.
‘“Literal” does not mean the inability to identify figures of speech or other non-literal genres. Since the Reformation, the “literal sense” of scripture has to do with interpreting according to the author’s intention. In his introduction to his commentary on Romans (1539), John Calvin put it this way:
“The chief excellency of an expounder consists in lucid brevity. And, indeed, since it is almost his only work to lay open the mind of the writer whom he undertakes to explain, the degree in which he leads away his readers from it, in that degree he goes astray from his purpose, and in a manner wanders from his own boundaries.”’
Burk, Denny. “What Does It Mean to Read the Bible Literally?” Denny Burk. N.p., 19 Aug. 2011. Web. Accessed 09 Nov. 2014.
The Bibliotheca Kickstarter project that I wrote about earlier this week (here: A Minimalist Bible For The Bibliophile) has gone viral.
When I wrote about it just 3 days ago the project had received $342,620 in funding… more than 9 times the project’s goal of $37,000. That was impressive— but since then interest in the Bibliotheca project has skyrocketed. As I write the pledged funding has jumped to $852,335 (2,303% of the project’s initial goal!!) and continues to climb.
On Kickstarter Biblotheca has been the 2nd or 3rd most popular project out of 161,964 projects over the last few days.
Additionally, Bibiotheca recently hit the mainstream media with glowing reviews from some of the biggest names in media. Here is a sample of just some of the articles:
I find all of this to be exciting on so many different levels. First and most obviously, I love the Bible. I’m looking forward to receiving and reading my copy (the scheduled delivery date is in December just in time for Christmas).
Secondly, I love books. I have several books that have been handed down to me from my grandfather, and a couple from my great-grandfather. Some are over 100 years old. It is so cool to read the very same books my ancestors read– to see what they underlined and their handwritten notes in the margin. Through this I feel a connection with prior generations.
Somehow, I cannot see my great-grandchildren combing though my ebooks. Will today’s ebooks even be accessible in 100 years? In my closet I have a few dust cover 3.5″ disks– I no longer own the technology to access 3.5″ disks. Those disks are only 20 years old.
Paperback books will not not survive the next 100 years. Cheap glue bound hardcover books will not survive either. Only high quality, hardcover books will survive the test of time– and what better book to preserve than the Bible?
Third, it’s so exciting to see the Bible draw this much attention beyond Christian circles. Truly God’s Word is alive. “The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever.” Isaiah 40:8 ESV.
I highly suggest checking out the project’s page and seriously consider supporting the project. The project’s funding period ends THIS Sunday, July 27, 2014 at 3:36 PM EDT.
NOTE: Adam Lewis Greene, who is the man behind the project, recently updated Bibliotheca’s project page with an added incentive: if the project reaches the $1 million mark he will “be able to add the Deuterocanonical Books (commonly called the Apocrypha).” I am a bit disappointed by this as the Apocrypha is not a part of the inspired cannon of scripture. I have no problem with someone reading the Apocrypha as it makes for very interesting reading. However, it is not on equal footing with the inspired 66 books of the Old and New Testaments. By including the Apocrypha in the same book set as the Old and New Testaments some may not realize this all important difference.
Last week, over at the Why We Web blog, I wrote about The ESV Reader’s Bible. A Bible that I dubbed as the “Minimalist Bible”.
Yesterday I happened to come across another ‘minimalist Bible’ through this tweet:
— Christian Hipster (@ChristnHipster) July 20, 2014
While the ESV Reader’s Bible is mass produced, reasonably low priced, and intended for the general public; Bibleiotheca is a high quality, limited edition, four volume set intended for the most discerning of bibliophiles. Bibleiotheca has not been printed yet so I have not been able to actually experience it yet. However, it is available for preorder through it’s Kickstarter page.
I believe the ‘minimalist Bible’ concept has already proven itself. The above video describes this concept very well. Here are a couple of insightful quotes from the video:
The book is actually doing work to eliminate distractions…
Why is that people love stories so much and yet they view reading Biblical literature as a chore? …could it be that the encyclopedic nature of our contemporary Bibles is what’s driving this idea that the Biblical literature is dry and boring?
Another proof of concept: the Bibliotheca Kickstarter project is overfunded! Overfunded by more than a factor 9! Amazing.
If you have any interest I suggest checking out Bibliotheca’s Kickstater page immediately as the funding period is set to close THIS Sunday July 27 2014 at 3:36 PM EDT.
After the funding period expires you may never have another opportunity to purchase a set.
My post this week over at the Why We Web blog is about a new edition of the ESV translation: The ESV Reader’s Bible.
This print edition of the ESV translation does not include footnotes, multicolor text, translator notes, study helps, cross references, or even verse divisions. Why would one ever want such a Bible?? Well, in this case less really is more!
Check out the post to see why I’m reading the “Reader’s Bible.”
Link: The Minimalist Bible